Please notify FCTO at fctopresident@aol.com if you wish to be added to our email list.
CONNECTICUTS STATE BUDGET
IS BACK IN THE RED, AS A PROPOSAL IS FLOATED FOR FEDERAL TAXPAYERS TO BAIL OUT PUBLIC
PENSIONS
November 15, 2017
From: The
Federation of Connecticut Taxpayer Org
Contact: Susan Kniep, President
Website: http://ctact.org/
Email: fctopresident@aol.com
Telephone: 860-841-8032
Yesterday, Keith Phaneuf of CTMirror.org reported
Newly
adopted CT budget already showing red ink.
Therein, Phaneuf writes:
Less than three weeks after legislators approved
the new state budget, eroding revenues have opened deficits topping $175
million this fiscal year and nearing $150 million in 2018-19. The consensus report from Gov. Dannel P. Malloys administration and the legislatures nonpartisan
Office of Fiscal Analysis also raises the risk the state might exhaust its
emergency reserves.
The governors caution regarding our ability to
get through FY 18 in balance under the bipartisan budget passed by the General
Assembly was well-warranted, Office of Policy and Management Secretary Ben
Barnes, Malloys budget director, said Monday. This
consensus revenue projection will likely place us more than $178 million in
deficit before we have even had an opportunity to effectuate the large lapses
and spending cuts built into the budget. OPM will finalize our projection
in our letter to the comptroller next week, and the administration will continue
to do its part to monitor revenues and expenditures closely. Continue Reading Every Word of this Excellent
Report→
Of course, this news is no surprise to many who
closely followed the state budget process. On Nov 1, 2017 in the headlined
article captioned Connecticut Governor Signs Budget That Keeps Pension Costs Unchanged
(James Comtois / Pensions & Investments) Therein,
it is noted
Currently, the state pays 100% of the employer
contribution to the $15.8 billion Teachers Retirement System and the $11
billion Connecticut State Employees Retirement System. The state government is
set to contribute $1.3 billion to TRS for the fiscal year 2018 and $1.32
billion for fiscal year 2019, and $1.2 billion to ERS for fiscal year 2018 and
$1.32 billion for fiscal year 2019, said Meg Green, a spokeswoman for the governors office.
Continue reading at http://www.pionline.com/article/20171101/ONLINE/171109994/connecticut-governor-signs-budget-that-keeps-pension-costs-unchanged
On November 9, 2017 Tyler Durden wrote It Begins: Pension Bailout
Bill May Be Introduced in Congress (Tyler Durden / Zero Hedge)
Durden writes:
Over the past year we have provided extensive
coverage of what will likely be the biggest, most politically charged, and most
significant financial crisis facing the aging U.S. population: a multi-trillion
pension storm, which was recently dubbed one of the most heated battles of a lifetime
by John Mauldin. The reason, in a nutshell, why the US public pension problem
has stumped so many professionals is simple: for lack of a better word, it is an unsustainable Ponzi scheme, in which
satisfying accrued pension and retirement obligations requires not only a
constant inflow of new money, but also fixed income returns, typically in the
6%+ range, which are virtually unfeasible in a world where global debt/GDP is
in the 300%+ range. Which is why we, and many others, have long
speculated that it is only a matter of time before the matter receives
political attention, and ultimately, a taxpayer bailout.
That moment may be imminent. According to Pensions and Investments magazine, Democratic
Senator Sherrod Brown from Ohio plans to introduce legislation that would allow struggling multiemployer
pension funds to borrow from the U.S. Treasury to remain solvent.
Recently I was asked by Channel 30 to offer my comments regarding
the state budget as approved by the State legislature. I used the
term smoke and mirrors when defining the credibility of the manner
in which the budget was approved. I suggested that soon it would be
evident that the budget was unsustainable and in turn could be catastrophic for
taxpayers both state and local as the band aid the State legislature applied
was guaranteed to fall off due to that which was festering underneath the
wound. And yes the budget was definitely
wounded. It should have been allowed to die a peaceful death, and our
State Legislators should have returned to the drawing board.
Democrats should have admitted their mistake of approving a 10 year contract agreements with the various state employee
unions which included job guarantees and wage increases while expecting state
and local taxpayers to pick up the remaining tab for the Multi Billion $$$$$
State Deficit.
They should have publicly asked the state employee unions to return
to the bargaining table. They could have stated that if the unions
refused, Connecticuts State legislature would pursue
that which the courts recently upheld in Wisconsin, as describe by the national
news network REUTERS.
U.S. appeals court upholds
Wisconsin right-to-work law - Reuters
Therein, Reuters reporter Timothy
Mclaughlin wrote on July 12, 2017
the following:
A U.S. appeals court on Wednesday upheld Wisconsins so-called right-to-work law, which bars
mandatory union membership and prohibits unions and employers from requiring
non-members to pay dues.
The plaintiffs did not provide any compelling
reason for the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago to revisit an
earlier ruling upholding a right-to-work law in a similar case in Indiana,
Judge Joel Flaum wrote.
Wisconsin Attorney General Brad Schimel The
Constitution does not protect a unions right to take
money from non-union members and I am proud to have defended the rule of law in
Wisconsin. Continue reading at https://www.reuters.com/article/us-wisconsin-labor/u-s-appeals-court-upholds-wisconsin-right-to-work-law-idUSKBN19X34T
But whether Connecticut State Legislators decide
to pursue this issue, the Supreme Court could ultimately hold the key to unlock
the stranglehold public sector unions have over government employees who do not
wish to join a union and taxpayers.
On Sept 28, 2017 Adam Ashton aashton@sacbee.com
noted the following in his article captioned Supreme Court takes Janus right to work case | The Sacramento Bee.
Therein, Ashton writes:
Californias
public sector unions are bracing for a Supreme Court decision that could lead
to steep drops in membership and revenue.
With the Supreme Court agreeing to hear the
(right to work) case, we are now one step closer to freeing over 5 million
public sector teachers, police officers, firefighters, and other employees from
the injustice of being forced to subsidize a union as a condition of working
for their own government, said Mark Mix, president of the National Right to
Work Legal Defense Foundation. Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/the-state-worker/article175980456.html#storylink=cpy
And yes, the decision of the Supreme Court could
ultimately impact public sector unions throughout the country to include
Connecticut!